The “Open VAR” segment continues to generate significant discussion among football fans, particularly those of the Nerazzurri, who frequently find themselves questioning the justification for dubious refereeing decisions. The latest focal point for debate was a handball incident involving Pongracic within the penalty area. This particular situation drew considerable scrutiny given that Marcus Thuram was positioned directly behind Pongracic, potentially poised to play the ball had the handball not occurred. Former referee and current CAN member Tonolini has since provided an official explanation for the VAR’s decision.
Tonolini’s Detailed Explanation on Open VAR
During his appearance on “Open VAR,” Tonolini meticulously broke down the incident: “Colombo’s on-field assessment was accurate; he was positioned optimally and judged the episode appropriately. The ball bounced in front of Pongracic, who attempted to play it using his heel. The contact with his hand occurred with his arm in an absolutely natural and congruous position relative to his body’s movement. This was unequivocally a non-punishable situation, and Colombo’s initial decision was correct, a decision subsequently affirmed by VAR Maresca and AVAR Massa.”
Does Thuram’s Presence Influence Punishability?
A key question that arose from the incident was whether the presence of Thuram, who was in a position to potentially gain possession of the ball, should have altered the ruling regarding the handball.
Tonolini’s Definitive Stance
Tonolini provided a clear and concise answer to this query: “No, absolutely not. The assessment of handball punishability is entirely independent of what the outcome of any subsequent action might have been. The fact that an opposing player was behind the individual in question changes nothing whatsoever concerning the ruling.”
